City of Richmond - File #: ORD. 1987-260-232

• File #: ORD. 1987-260-232
• Version: 1
• Type: Ordinance
• Status: Adopted
• File created: 8/29/2025
• In control: City Council
• On agenda: 11/9/1987
• Final action: 11/9/1987
• Title: To amend and reordain Ordinance No. 86-302-274, adopted December 8, 1986, entitle: To authorize Hilton W. Goodwyn, Jr., and John W. Pearsall, Trustee, owners, and Successors thereof, to encroach in, on, upon, across, into, though, under and along the south right of way line of Main Street, the east right of way line of 6th Street, and the north right of way line of an east-west alley 13.6 feet, more or less, in width that extends from the easterly right of way line of 6th Street to the westerly right of way line of 7th Street, with concrete pier bells, as shown on Department of Public Works Drawing No. N-21601, dated October 23, 1986, entitled: "Proposed Underground Encroachments (concrete pier bells) in Main St. (S/L), 6th St. (E/L), and an Alley (N/L) Between Main St. and Cary St. (Goodwyn Parking Deck)", upon certain terms and conditions", concerning approval by City Attorney of bond required as requisite for ordinance becoming effective.

title

To amend and reordain Ordinance No. 86-302-274, adopted December 8, 1986, entitle: To authorize Hilton W. Goodwyn, Jr., and John W. Pearsall, Trustee, owners, and Successors thereof, to encroach in, on, upon, across, into, though, under and along the south right of way line of Main Street, the east right of way line of 6^th Street, and the north right of way line of an east-west alley 13.6 feet, more or less, in width that extends from the easterly right of way line of 6^th Street to the westerly right of way line of 7^th Street, with concrete pier bells, as shown on Department of Public Works Drawing No. N-21601, dated October 23, 1986, entitled: “Proposed Underground Encroachments (concrete pier bells) in Main St. (S/L), 6^th St. (E/L), and an Alley (N/L) Between Main St. and Cary St. (Goodwyn Parking Deck)”, upon certain terms and conditions”, concerning approval by City Attorney of bond required as requisite for ordinance becoming effective.